Protecting children from online harm is a goal we all share, and there is no question that more needs to be done to keep them safe.

However, approaches like a current proposal in the Nebraska Legislature, the Age-Appropriate Online Design Code Act, bring a host of significant privacy concerns and could further expand the size and role of government, placing the government between the rights of parents and their children.

Changes like requiring age verification, as LB 504 does, threaten our most fundamental rights to free expression, risk exposing our data to cyber-attacks, and could lead to dangerous government censorship.

Database Challenges

Forcing platforms like ours to collect identifying personal information on every single user imposes undue barriers to users’ exercise of constitutionally protected speech online.

This isn’t just inconvenient for users but is actively harmful to tech start-ups like ours as it suddenly forces us to maintain a massive database of sensitive information all in one place. That sort of database is ripe for theft by cybercriminals.

Moreover, it holds enormous and potentially disastrous consequences for free expression online: overly broad duty of care provisions would require any online platforms hosting user-submitted content to know the ages of every single user or risk litigation.

It is not hard to envision how this could pressure some platforms to remove or cease hosting user-submitted content to avoid liability exposure, casting a broad chilling effect on online speech and reducing the outlets users have for free expression online.

Risk Of Government Overreach

Current kids’ online safety proposals aren’t just harmful. The government is expressly forbidden from making speech determinations under the First Amendment, for example, yet under these proposals would be determining what is and isn’t child-appropriate, a job for parents, not government.

Inserting government into that conversation threatens parental autonomy by depriving parents of the opportunity to choose what’s best for children, overstepping current regulations.

This new legislation would be burdensome to small businesses like ours. Moreover, there is no solid implementation framework in LB 504 to adequately address privacy concerns previously shared.

These regulations would likely stifle Nebraska’s growing Silicon Prairie, discouraging innovation and encouraging our best and brightest to leave for states with more reasonable rules.

At a time when it’s harder than ever to start a new business and brain drain continues to be one of our most pressing issues, we should be fostering an environment that creates technological advancements, particularly in artificial intelligence and digital security, that could improve online safety.

Parents Know Best

The right approach to child safety online is to put parents at the heart of this process and empower them to make the best decisions for their children. Only through education and parental empowerment can we make meaningful strides without depriving kids of crucial opportunities to learn and grow through interaction with the broader world online.

We should scale back heavy-handed regulations and promote a forward-thinking tech environment that positions Nebraska as a hub for innovation, free expression and the responsible development of emerging technologies.

Andrew Prystai is co-founder of Event Vesta, an event discovery and promotion platform. All opinions expressed are solely his.

This story was published by Nebraska Examiner, an editorially independent newsroom providing a hard-hitting, daily flow of news. Read the original article: https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2025/04/08/kids-online-safety-measures-can-do-more-harm-than-good/

Opinions expressed by columnists in The Daily Record are not necessarily those of its management or staff, and do not constitute an endorsement or recommendation. Any errors or omissions should be called to our attention so that they may be corrected. Contact us at news@omahadailyrecord.com.